| Hello everybody,
As many of you know, the much-anticipated
Da Vinci Code opened last weekend. Interestingly, the secular
media seems to think the movie stinks. Although a few critics
enjoyed it, the vast majority think it’s mediocre. So if the Vatican's
call for a boycott hasn't convinced you yet, maybe your natural
aversion to boredom might persuade you to avoid the movie. Below,
I have copied some excerpts of what secular critics have said
about the movie.
Some Christians have told me that they need to
see the movie in order to be able to contradict its errors and
enlighten "secular" people or fallen-away Christians
who believe its falsehoods. I couldn't disagree more. If you find
yourself in an argument, the "secular" people that have
seen the movie will tell you what claims it makes; then you can
proceed to refute them. You don't need to see this movie.
THE SECULAR CRITICS SPEAK...
"Da Vinci is a dud. The reviewers agree:
There's little to get worked up about" - Ottawa Citizen
"Film version of The Da Vinci Code tumbles
into the depths of mediocrity" -- Ottawa Sun
"Neither Hanks nor Tautou can save the most
bloated film of the season" - Globe and Mail
"The film bogs down in its explain-everything
scenes and the flashbacks" - Sun Media
"Vatican needn't fret; it's just a mediocre
movie after all" - Ottawa Citizen
"Da Vinci groan" -- Globe and Mail
"Despite the running start from Brown's swift-moving
prose, Howard just can't get the movie off the ground" -
Calgary Herald
"Long, plodding" - The Record (Kitchener)
"What they've given us is a rather dull series
of history and art lessons" - Sun Media
"No ultimate satisfaction in Da Vinci"
- Times & Transcript (Moncton)
"As sturdy and versatile an actor as Hanks
can be, he can't work miracles." - Associated Press
"Da Vinci never rises to the level of a guilty
pleasure. Too much guilt. Not enough pleasure." - The Hollywood
Reporter
"It's not a good sign when your film's big
revelatory moment is greeted with laughter." -- Boston Herald
"Grim... lacklustre" -- Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel
"You know a movie's a dud when even its self-flagellating
albino killer monk isn't any fun." -- Commercial Appeal (Memphis)
"How can a film contain so many clues yet
remain utterly clueless?" -- Chicago Tribune
"Stodgy, grim thing" -- Variety magazine
"It's not very good -- long (2 hr., 32 min.)
and mostly inert. Tom Hanks seems to sleepwalk through the part."
-- Time magazine
"Lethally long-winded" -- Philadelphia
Inquirer
"It is impossible to believe that, had the
novel never existed, such a script would ever have been considered
by a Hollywood studio." -- Daily Variety |